On the likelihood of making out on the target, there can be a critical interaction anywhere between grandiose narcissism and you may new member intercourse, ? = .161, t = 2.819, p = .005. It telecommunications was shown inside the Fig dos. The simple hills for males (effortless slope = 0.051., t = .007, p = .995) and you may girls (effortless hill = -0.011., t = -0.002, p = .999) just weren’t high. Grandiose narcissists did not display a heightened likelihood of kissing which have a connected target over a single one (? = .068, t = 1.127, p = .261), indicating you to grandiose narcissism was not regarding the lover poaching to possess an initial-identity affair.
Grandiose narcissists tend to statement lover poaching -especially for the new brief-label . But not, a concern remains about whether or not they pick people in dating way more really worth pursuing than just individuals who are unmarried. Widman and you will McNulty reason why grandiose narcissistic tendencies is activated across points on average (for instance the mind-declaration of lives prevalence from intimate choices), however getting triggered when listed in a specific condition. Therefore, it is possible you to definitely grandiose narcissists disclose a reputation interesting inside lover poaching, but do not always get a hold of those in relationships are ideal friends. I checked-out which chance during the five knowledge.
Mate poaching inventory.
For long-term spouse poaching, grandiose narcissism are a life threatening predictor for women (? = .306, t = dos.623, p = .010) and you can a marginally high predictor for men (? = .218, t = step one.725, p = .088). Not one of your Huge Four variables have been tall. Grandiose narcissism was not a life threatening predictor regarding achievement at the poaching on long-label for males (? = .120, t = 0.718, p = .476), however it try for ladies (? = .340, t = 2.369, p = .021). Nothing of the other variables were high except for women’s neuroticism; when females were a great deal more neurotic, they stated even more achievements within poaching for a long-identity intimate relationships.
Performance
Of interest, grandiose Thai dating review narcissism was not of this mate poaching certainly one of people. That it outcome is in line with abilities advertised by Kardum and you will acquaintances . Thus, you’ll be able you to definitely grandiose narcissistic women can be more frequently guilty from partner poaching.
Product and you will processes
There was a significant three-way interaction between grandiose narcissism, participant relationship status, and participant sex for the likelihood of pursuing the target for a relationship (? = .162, t = 2.666, p = .008). This three-way interaction is displayed in Fig 1. Data are plotted at ±1 SD from the mean of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for attached men was significant (simple slope = .05, t = 9.24, p < .001), revealing that men in a relationship were more likely to pursue the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for attached women (simple slope = -.04, t = -3.27, p = .001) revealed that women in a relationship were less likely to pursue the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for single men was also significant (simple slope = -.02, t = -2.38, p = .02), revealing that single men were less interested in pursuing the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for single women was not significant (simple slope = .024, t = 1.56, p = .12). With the exception of the slope differences between single women and attached men (t = -1.65, p = .10), the differences in slopes were all significant (ts ? -2.16, ps ? .03). The grandiose narcissism ? target relationship status interaction was not significant (? = .068, t = 1.127, p = .261), indicating that grandiose narcissism was not associated with mate poaching for a long-term affair.