Among the numerous John Anna Porter youngsters I’ve viewed provided upwards…

Among the numerous John Anna Porter youngsters I’ve viewed provided upwards…

(and why he is most likely completely wrong):

Why must they have another James if very first a person is nevertheless as much as? 1638 is assumed to-be the season regarding immigration; the actual only real admission when you look at the Parish facts to own an effective James Porter, boy off John and you will Anna Porter, is actually for the main one “officially” in the above list that was Baptized 20 Feb 1627. Possibly it time is signifying rather an use sort of matter having whoever John Anna leftover James which have when they decided to go to America, or maybe he was re baptized…? Merely putting stuff available to you.

Impractical. Possibly the guy and Sarah were twins otherwise Anna got personal back to back pregnancies; not when you look at the Parish facts, nor said within the John Porter’s often.

Possibly the past man, however if so, the guy should have died young as there is no reference to a guy Joseph for the John Porter’s have a tendency to – really, ok, ok, sure discover, however, you to “boy Joseph Judson” is simply discussing a son-in-rules, maybe not a physical child – that is probably where the confusion been. That history claims Joseph grew up in Felsted, Essex, England – the family was gone from this big date, so if that is true, upcoming it Joily.


Whenever reading through individuals Porter histories and you may family relations woods, there is certainly some certainly biggest dilemma with Anna’s title and lots of girl and you may blend every one of them upwards – there can be Anna and you may Rose, then there is Johanna and you may Hannah, that one another come referred to as Anna, contributing to the dilemma.

With Anna, when i first started watching the girl referred to as Rose, We thought that possibly John Porter nicknamed Anna their “Rose”, utilising the moniker later whenever naming among its ladies. But, I learned that John had a sister Flower, and from now on imagine it absolutely was only an earlier mistake where individuals baffled Anna which have John’s sister in early stages and you may/or afterwards through its child Rose, in the course of their passing.

And additionally, In my opinion their oldest daughter, Anna (Anna per Parish suggestions) and you may Johanna have a tendency to listed on of several John Porter-Anna Light histories, are that and the exact same. No Johanna was said in early Parish ideas. Not sure where in fact the name Johanna originated (in the event We have a principle less than and is also a good mixing from mommy father’s names), however in the need (note: dos oldest daughters, Anna and you may Sara are not stated into the John’s have a tendency to while they acquired the piece once they married), adopting the one or two oldest sons, the youngsters try listed in birth order (very first boys, next females), that have an Anna noted history. If so, as to the reasons some other Anna? Had the earliest Anna come passing by Johanna through this time, so they e once again, otherwise was just about it constantly Johanna, however, mislisted inside Parish information? Performed it name each of their lady Anna. Performed John produce his will himself otherwise was just about it transcribed from the some one? I am aware brand new youngest “Anna” is actually Hannah, and that music nearly similar.

Requires way more lookup, however, we all know one John Anna’s d Gaylord; Apparently, John Anna’s child John had a man entitled John exactly who married a beneficial Joanna Gaylord, who had been the latest Grandd Gaylord (so they really were cousins after they partnered); Although several years from, the similarity for the labels was unquestionable – my personal instinct tells me this is exactly most likely where in fact the Anna/Johanna confusion originates from.


In depth watercraft lists of numerous of the very early arrivals was unavailable for various explanations, however, among those causes are given that to possess a period of time during the Massachusetts Bay Colony’s Governor John Winthrop’s period, he chose to not need a single a number of passengers and you may alternatively recognized only an entire amount. Their number entryway for approximately step 1 September 1638 and that accounted for 20 boat arrivals more than that summer are short term:

Leave a Reply

لن يتم نشر عنوان بريدك الإلكتروني.