letter = try proportions, deff = structure effect, Letter = populace dimensions, p = estimated ratio, q = step 1 ? p, d = desired sheer precision/natural level of reliability.
The fresh new survey was made inside English language and classified for the around three chief sections. Part you to covered bio-investigation (we.e., age, degree an such like.) away from respondents. Area one or two consisted of situations examining soldiers’ feeling (we.e., Maybe you’ve been aware of prostate disease ahead of?) and you may knowledge about Desktop computer (we.e., prostate malignant tumors was sexually transmitted) toward a great five-part Likert size ranging from step 1 = highly differ to help you 5 = firmly agree. Section three contains products related to soldiers’ attitudes (we.elizabeth., tests can help during the early detection of one’s prostate cancer) and you may aim (we.elizabeth., We have aim regarding examination for Desktop) into early identification off Desktop computer all the into a great five-point Likert size. This new survey was piloted and you may modified into help of good senior specialist.
Agree away from participants is removed before starting out having research collection. Users was basically hoping out-of confidentiality and you can privacy, together with identities of respondents weren’t removed. Participation try strictly volunteer, without respondent are coerced otherwise inclined to engage. The latest questionnaires were missing immediately following entering the analysis, and you may recommendations try erased on the computer system and you may research stores equipment adopting the latest declaration.
The latest questionnaire was coded, and investigation was indeed entered for the analytical application (SPSS) variation twenty two
Study was indeed examined with Statistical Bundle into Personal Sciences (SPSS), adaptation twenty-two.0. 0. Analysis tidy up are over, and inconsistencies having completely wrong type in results was basically rectified prior to creating area of the investigation. Univariate and you will bivariate analyses was carried out, and you will overall performance were exhibited playing with frequency dining tables, club charts and you may mix-tabulation.
step three Efficiency
It actually was found that out of the 140 respondents, 72.3% is actually married, 72% had college degree and you will 69.8% had attained officer’s review. Just 77% of respondents made significantly more than GHC 2000 ($ 400) a month, 91.2% belonged on Christian believe and you will 58.3% had worked for over 10 years from the force. It had been in addition to discovered that 59% of the respondents was young people (below forty years) and 66.7% got signed up for a medical insurance rules.
The results show that 96.3% of one’s participants had heard about prostate cancers and you will 54.7% of the participants quoted the fresh new news (instance, tv, broadcast and also the internet sites) since their first way to obtain pointers. Likewise, 76.3% of one’s respondents did indicate that it understood one Desktop assessment test and 53.3% of respondents stated that they certainly were acquainted with the fresh signs out of prostate cancer tumors. However, 81.3% of your own respondents got never ever screened otherwise tested having Desktop. Additionally, 59.7% got never gotten any testimonial of a healthcare staff to endure Desktop computer assessment, while 55.8% of the respondents stated that they’d not obtained any wellness degree for the prostate cancer tumors. 78.3% didn’t understand their loved ones background of Desktop. Thus, the brand new substance score implies that 58.3% of the participants was in fact reduced alert to Desktop (pick Desk step 1).
As well, it was found that some of the participants had been less educated in regards to the cues and you may chance products from Desktop. From Table dos, the typical scores ranged between dos.95 and you will step 3.85. What this means is a large number of new participants none disagreed neither assented to your affairs with the level. For instance, certain participants both disagreed or weren’t sure once the to if alcohol consumption (59.1%), substandard eating plan (63.7%) and you can bodily helpful resources inactivity (61.4%) were risk points regarding prostate disease. Concerning your signs and symptoms of prostate disease, some of the respondents both disagreed otherwise was basically unclear regarding if chronic nightmare (76.7%), blood for the pee otherwise semen (54.5%), aches on scrotum (52.6%) and lower back and leg serious pain (60.5%) had been signs and symptoms of prostate cancer (get a hold of Dining table dos).